New Changes Introduced by the Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020

Posted on April 27th, 2020

INTRODUCTION

Kenya’s economy is currently sailing through uncharted waters, forcing the government to come up with tax amendments aimed at alleviating the tax burden on Kenyans and boosting liquidity amidst the coronavirus pandemic. Parliament has passed the Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020 (the “Act”) which was assented to by the President on 25th April 2020.

 

THE AMENDMENTS

The Act has made several amendments to tax laws and tax related laws. We highlight the same hereunder.

The Income Tax Act

Qualifying Interest

The definition of ‘Qualifying Interest’ under section 2 of the Income Tax Act has been amended by removing the restriction to interest from financial institutions, banking institutions, building societies or the Central Bank. This effectively means that interest earned in other commercial investments amounts to qualifying interest and withholding tax on the same will be Final tax.

Withholding Taxes 

Sections 10(1) and 35(1)(o) of the Income Tax Act have been amended to the effect that payments made to non-residents for sales promotion, marketing, advertising services, and transportation of goods (excluding air and shipping transport services) will now be subject to withholding taxes at the rate of 20% of the gross amount.

Paragraph 3(d) of the Third Schedule of the Income Tax Act has been amended by increasing the non-resident tax rate from 10% to 15% with respect to a dividend. Paragraph 3(p) too has been amended to include reinsurance and by further adding to the list sales promotion, marketing, advertising services, and transportation of goods (excluding air and shipping transport) services at 20% of the gross amount.

The rates of the resident withholding tax rates (Paragraph 5(d)) have been amended by increasing the amounts of money applicable with respect to pensions funds and pensions income. This means that those earning pensions below Kshs. 288,000 will not have the withholding rates applicable to them.  Finally, paragraph 9 of the Third Schedule has been amended reducing the presumptive tax rate from 3% to 1% in line with the presidential directive on tax reliefs

Turnover Tax

Turnover tax was previously applicable at the rate of 3% on businesses earning a maximum income of Kshs. 5 Million. Subject to an amendment of section 12C (1) of the Income Tax Act, companies as well as businesses (including partnerships and sole proprietors) with an income of between Kshs. 1 Million and Kshs. 50 Million can opt to be subjected to turnover tax at the rate of 1% of the gross receipts.

Presumptive Tax

By deleting section 12C (5) of the Income Tax Act, presumptive tax at the rate of 15% of the single business permit at the time of renewal has been removed. It will consequently be payable by monthly filings to Kenya Revenue Authority.

Allowable Expenses

Section 15 (2) (ab) of Income Tax Act that provided for a 30% rebate on electricity costs incurred by manufacturers has been deleted. This means that the same will no longer be deducted in the ascertainment of the total taxable income.

Incomes Exempt from Taxes

The First Schedule of the Income Tax Act that sets out incomes expressly exempt from income tax has been amended by deleting a number of paragraphs. This means that the following incomes will now be subject to Income Taxes.

  1. Income from certain state boards and authorities including Pyrethrum Board of Kenya, Sisal Board of Kenya, Kenya Dairy Board, Canning Crops Board, Central Agricultural Board, Pig Industry Board, Pineapple Development Authority, Horticultural Crop Development Authority,  National Irrigation Board, Mombasa Pipeline Board, Settlement Fund Trustees, Kenya Post Office Savings Bank; and  Cotton Board of Kenya.
  2. Profits made by the Agricultural Society of Kenya from an exhibition held for purposes of the society.
  3. Interest on tax reserve certificates which may be issued by authority of Government.
  4. Gains on transfer of shares of a local authority.
  5. Gains on transfer of land adjudicated under Land Consolidation Act and Land Adjudication Act when the title has been registered under the Registered Land Act and transferred for the first time.
  6. Interest earned on contributions paid into the Deposit Protection Fund.
  7. Interest earned on loans granted by the Local Government Loans Authority established under the Local Government Loans Act.
  8. Dividends received by a registered venture capital company.
  9. Gains from the trade in shares of a venture company earned by a registered venture company within the first ten years from the date on first investment in that venture company by the venture capital company.
  10. Interest income generated from cash flows passed to the investor in the form of asset backed securities.
  11. Dividends paid by a registered special economic zone enterprise, developer and operator to non-resident persons.

 

Capital Deductions

The rate of Investment allowances for certain Capital Expenditures have been amended as follows:

Particulars Rate
Hotel buildings, buildings in use for manufacture, hospital buildings, petroleum or gas storage facilities, 50% in the year of first use and 25% per year on reducing balance.
Educational and commercial buildings 10% per year on reducing balance
Machinery used for manufacture, hospital equipment, ships or aircrafts 50% in the year of first use and 25% per year on reducing balance.
Motor vehicle and heavy earth moving equipment, computer and peripheral computer hardware and software 25% per year on reducing balance.
Furniture and fittings, telecommunications equipment, 10% per year on reducing balance
Filming equipment by local producer 25% per year on reducing balance.
Machinery used to undertake exploration or operations on prospective rights or mining right 50% in year of first use and 25% on a reducing balance basis thereafter

 

PAYE

The amount of personal relief has been increased from Kshs.16,896 p.a to Kshs. 28,800 p.a.

The rate of tax in the highest income tax bracket has been reduced from 30% to 25% and the income subject to tax in the highest bracket has been increased from Kshs. 47,059 to Kshs. 57,333.

Withdrawals from a registered pension or provident scheme or the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) before the expiry of 15 years from the date of joining the scheme has been aligned to the individual tax rates. On the other hand, any withdrawal from a registered pension or provident scheme or NSSF after the expiry of 15 years from the date of joining the scheme for amounts exceeding Kshs 1.2 million, has been reduced from 30% to 25%.

 

The Value Added Tax Act (VAT Act)

Standard Rate

The standard VAT rate had been revised from the standard rate of 16% to 14% by way of Gazette Notice.

Credit Notes

Subject to the VAT Act, Credit Notes can be issued after 6 months from the invoice date. In the case where there is a commercial dispute in relation to the price payable, a credit note can be issued within 30 days after determination of the matter.

Refunds of Tax on Bad Debts

Section 31 of the VAT Act has been amended by reducing the period within which a taxpayer may apply for a refund from 5 years to 4 years from the date of the supply.

Record Keeping

The Act has also amended section 43(1) of the VAT Act  by deleting the word “every registered” and inserting the article “A” this means that every person whether  registered or not, is required to keep records of all their business transactions for at least 5 years.

Exempt Items

Personal protective gear including masks that were subject to VAT at the standard rate of 14% are now exempt. Further, vaccines for use in human and veterinary medicine, infusion solutions and medicaments cease are now exempt.

The following items that have been exempt will now be subject to VAT at the standard rate of 14%.

  1. Plant and machinery used for manufacture of goods.
  2. Taxable supplies imported or locally purchased for use in construction of power generating plants.
  3. Plastic biogas digesters.
  4. Biogas and Leasing of biogas production digesters.
  5. Parts imported or purchased locally for information technology purposes (subject to approval of the Cabinet Secretary).
  6. Goods imported or purchased for use in construction and development of industrial parks of 100 acres.
  7. Exhibits, specimens, equipment, chemical reagents, films, film strips, visual aid equipment for public museums.
  8. Asset transfer and other transactions related to the transfer of assets into a Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT) and other asset-based securities.

 

The Excise Duty Act, 2015

The definition of “other fees’ as set out in the First Schedule Part III of the Excise Duty Act has been amended by deleting the words “licensed financial institutions” and substituting it with the words “licensed activities.” This effectively means that excise duty is only applicable on licensed activities of a financial institution.

 

Tax Procedures Act, 2015

Private Ruling

Sections 65(3) of Tax Procedures Act has been amended by extending the period within which the Commissioner should determine a private ruling from 45 days to 60 days. Further, section 69 requiring publication of Private Ruling has been repealed.

 

Penalty for Late Filling of Turnover Tax Returns

Subject to the amended section 83(1)(b) of the Tax Procedures Act, the penalty for the late filing of Turnover tax returns has been reduced from Kshs. 5,000 to Kshs. 1,000.

 

The Kenya Revenue Authority Act, 1995

The KRA Act has been amended by inserting a new section 15A that empowers the Commissioner to appoint a bank to act as an agent for revenue banking services .The said agent is required to transfer the funds to the designated Central Bank of Kenya accounts within a maximum of 2 days following the date of collection. Failure to comply with this provision imposes a tax debt on the appointed agent.


This alert is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as or construed to be legal advice. If you have any queries or need clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact Partner, Lena Onchwari (lena@oraro.co.ke), and Associate, Wanjala Opwora (wanjala@oraro.co.ke) or your usual contact at our firm, for legal advice relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and how the same might affect you.

Whether a Chargee is Obligated to Pay Capital Gains Tax Upon the Exercise of Statutory Power of Sale and Suspension of “Twin Payment” of Capital Gains Tax and Stamp Duty

Posted on April 9th, 2020

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) is a tax payable under the Income Tax Act by a proprietor of land upon transfer of such land and/or buildings. In Kenya, CGT was re-introduced on 1st January 2015 after being suspended in 1985.

Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) issued a public notice on 4th October 2016 requiring that CGT and Stamp Duty be paid through the KRA i-Tax online platform. This effectively meant that CGT and Stamp Duty would be paid simultaneously before any transfer of property could be completed. Prior to payment of Stamp Duty, a purchaser was required to present an approved CGT slip as proof of payment of CGT by the vendor or exemption therefrom as the case may be.

In September 2019, KRA introduced an additional layer to the transfer process by requiring approval and verification of all transactions declared as exempt from CGT.

Kenya Bankers Association (KBA) on behalf of licensed banks who were aggrieved by the mandatory requirement of presentation of an approved CGT slip prior to the payment of Stamp Duty by a purchaser, moved to Court (Kenya Revenue Authority v Kenya Bankers Associations [2020] eKLR) to challenge this requirement by the KRA . KBA argued that the requirement would place the burden of paying CGT that is ordinarily payable by a property owner on either a bank exercising its statutory power of sale to recover a debt or a purchaser in the circumstances.

The Court of Appeal considered the following issues among others:

  1. Whether when exercising the power of sale by, a chargee does so as a proprietor of the charge or of the land?
  2. Whether a chargee in exercise of the statutory power of sale is obligated to pay CGT?
  3. Whether CGT is a tax payable on the charged land or on the income of the proprietor of the land?

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court that held as follows:

  1. that a chargee is a proprietor of the charge and not of the charged land.
  2. That a chargee in executing a transfer by charge does so as a nominee of the chargor by virtue of the charge and not as the proprietor of the land.
  3. CGT is a tax payable on the income of the proprietor of the land and is not a tax payable on the charged land.

The Court of Appeal concluded that requiring a chargee exercising its statutory power of sale or purchaser to pay CGT without first ascertaining whether there is in fact capital gain is unreasonable and unfair. KRA was directed to allow for payment of Stamp Duty on an instrument of transfer following the sale of land by a bank pursuant to a bank’s statutory power of sale, without requiring prior payment of CGT. (To view the decision click here)

Subsequent to the above decision, KRA published a notice on 23rd March 2020 dispensing with the conditional presentation of a CGT Acknowledgement Slip before Stamp Duty payment is processed. (To view notice click here).

Effectively, as soon as the necessary adjustments are in place, it will no longer be mandatory to present proof of payment of CGT prior to payment of Stamp Duty and registration of a disposition in land.

Landowners are however still liable to pay CGT only that the same can now be paid after completion of the transfer process. KRA has indeed emphasized that transfer of property will still attract CGT to be paid by the transferor on or before the 20th day of the following month in which the transfer of property is effected.

We are of the view that these changes will go a long way in expediting the transfer process.  This will complement the government’s recent efforts of improving the ease of doing business in Kenya by creating efficiency in the transfer process and promoting investments in the real estate sector.


The content of this alert is intended to be of general information only and should not be relied upon without seeking specific legal advice on any matter.


Should you have any queries or questions on the legal alert, please do not hesitate to contact Nelly Gitau (nelly@oraro.co.ke) or Tesrah Wamache (tesrah@oraro.co.ke).

Salient Changes Under the Business Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020

Posted on March 30th, 2020

On 18th March, 2020 the President assented to the Business Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020 (the Act). The Act, which came into force on its date of assent, seeks to facilitate the ease of doing business in Kenya by amending various statutes. Below is a summary of the salient changes brought about by the Act, that affect specific sectors:

CONVEYANCING AND REAL ESTATE
Electronic Execution of Documents
The Act recognises the use of advanced electronic signatures and electronic signatures as a valid mode of execution of documents in Kenya. The recognition of electronic signatures is poised to improve the ease at which land transactions are carried out, especially in transactions where the parties are not in Kenya at the time of execution.

The Stamp Duty Act has equally been amended to provide that documents can be electronically stamped, extending the scope of the initial provision which only recognized stamping by a franking machine or an adhesive stamp.

Electronic Registries
The Registration of Documents Act (the RDA) has been amended to recognise electronic filing of documents. The Registrar of Documents is empowered to establish both the Principal Registry in Nairobi and the Coast Registry in electronic form. This is intended to ease the process of applying for registration of documents under the RDA, as one may not require to physically present a document for registration at either of the two Registries.

Abolishment of Land Rate and Land Rent Clearance Certificates
Previously, a person seeking to register an interest in land was required to provide proof of payment of land rates and land rent before registration is effected. An application for registration therefore had to be accompanied with Rates and Rent Clearance Certificates where rent and rates were payable.

The Act has deleted these provisions in entirety implying that it shall no longer be mandatory to produce Land Rent and Rates Clearance Certificates when applying for registration of an interest in land. Transferees therefore have to individually carry out their own due diligence and satisfy themselves that rent and rates have been paid in order to avoid assuming these liabilities.

It is however important to note that although Section 38 and 39 have been deleted from the Land Registration Act, Sections 55 (b) and 56 (4) which require production of a Rent Clearance Certificate and Consent to Lease or Charge prior to registration remain in force. It will, therefore, be necessary to address this disparity going forward, in order to clarify the applicable completion documents in property dealings.

EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR
Waiver of Registration of Workplaces for new businesses
New businesses with less than one hundred (100) employees can now operate without registration of a workplace for a period of one year from the date of registration of the business. This provision is set to provide small and medium sized enterprises with more time to register their workplaces.

CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL
Increased threshold for enforcing Squeeze-Out rights in mergers and takeovers
The stake that an acquiring party should purchase before enforcing a squeeze-out has been restored to ninety per cent (90%) from the current stake of fifty per cent (50%). The increase in the squeeze-out threshold seeks to restore the protection of the rights of minority shareholders, especially in listed companies.

Abolishment of the use of common seals in execution
The use of common seals in executing contracts by companies has been abolished. The adoption of this amendment broadens the scope for holding a company accountable for contracts as such contracts may be executed by any person acting under its authority, express or implied authority.

Treatment of bearer shares
Bearers of share warrants can now convert their warrants into registered shares. This provision is poised to recognize and protect the rights of bearers acquired before the coming into force of the Companies Act, 2015.

RESTRUCTURING AND INSOLVENCY
Additional factors to consider when lifting a moratorium in insolvency matters
The Act has included additional factors to consider when the courts seek to lift a moratorium in insolvency. These include, whether the value of the secured creditor’s claim exceeds the value of the encumbered asset, whether the secured creditor is not receiving protection for the diminution in the value of the encumbered asset, whether the encumbered asset is not needed for the reorganisation or sale of the company as a going concern and whether relief is required to protect or preserve the value of the assets such as perishable goods.. The inclusion of these factors is to take into account the different business exigencies of companies under administration.

Information requests by creditors
The Act gives creditors the right to request for information from the insolvency practitioner in respect of the insolvency process. The information rights will provide more transparency in relation to the insolvency process in Kenya.

CONSTRUCTION
Enforcement of the Building Code
The National Construction Authority (NCA) has been authorised to promulgate and enforce the Building Code in the construction industry. Consequently, any matters concerning compliance with the Building Code shall be under the purview of the NCA. The NCA will also have power to promulgate regulations relating to and to conduct mandatory inspections of the construction sites with a view to verify and confirm whether contractors are complying with the construction regulations.

TAX
Investment deductions, exemption of supplies for bulk storage of Standard Gauge Railway raw materials and market protectionism
Companies that incur a capital expenditure of at least Kenya Shillings Five Billion (KES 5,000,000,000) on construction of bulk storage and handling facilities with a minimum capacity of one hundred thousand metric tonnes in relation to the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR), will be entitled to investment deductions equal to one hundred and fifty per cent (150%) of the capital expenditure incurred from the year of first use of the facility.
Additionally, taxable supplies procured locally or imported for the construction of bulk storage in support of the SGR operations are exempted from paying import declaration fees.

Further, a twenty five per cent (25%) tax has been imposed on imported glass bottles under the Excise Duty Act.

The adoption of these amendments is intended to boost businesses for local manufacturers and ultimately grow Kenyan brands.


This alert is for informational purposes only and should not be taken to be or construed as a legal opinion. If you have any queries or need clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact Pamella Ager (pamella@oraro.co.ke), Nelly Gitau (nelly@oraro.co.ke), Jacob Ochieng (jacob@oraro.co.ke), Lena Onchwari (lena@oraro.co.ke), Naeem Hirani (naeem@oraro.co.ke) or your usual contact at our firm, for legal advice relating to the Business Laws (Amendment) Act, 2020 and how the same might affect your business.

Obligations of a Company in Relation to Disclosure of Company Beneficial Ownership Information

Posted on March 4th, 2020

Prior to the coming into force of the Companies Act No.17 of 2015 (the ”Companies Act”), Kenyan Companies were not required to disclose the details of their beneficial ownership of shares. However, pursuant to the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 and subsequently the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 12 of 2019 which introduced section 93A of the Companies Act, companies incorporated or registered in Kenya are required to keep a register of beneficial owners with the relevant information relating to the said beneficial owners as prescribed by the regulations made under the Companies Act.

The Attorney General has published the Companies (Beneficial Ownership Information) Regulations, 2020 (the “Regulations”) which set out in greater detail how these disclosures are to be made and the obligations of a company in relation to these disclosures.

The Regulations define a beneficial owner as the natural person who ultimately owns or controls (emphasis is added) a legal person or arrangements or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is conducted, and includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person or arrangement (emphasis is added).

The Regulations apply to a beneficial owner who:

  1. holds at least 10% of the issued shares in the company either directly or indirectly;
  2. exercises at least 10% of the voting rights in the company;
  3. holds a right to directly or indirectly appoint or remove a director of the company; or
  4. exercises significant influence or control over the company (emphasis is added).

The term “exercises significant influence or control over the companyhas been defined to mean participation in the finances and financial policies of a company without necessarily having full control over them. This definition is quite wide and may have the effect of covering management and financial advisory companies.

The Regulations also require a company to take reasonable steps to identify its beneficial owners and enter their details in its register of members. The particulars to be included in the register include; the full name, birth certificate number, national identity number, national identity card number or passport, personal identification number, nationality, date of birth, postal address, business address, residential address, telephone number, email address, occupation or profession, nature of ownership or control and the date on which any person ceased to be a beneficial owner.

The Regulations require a company to lodge with the Registrar of Companies (the “Registrar”) in the prescribed form, a copy of its register of beneficial owners within 30 days after its preparation. A company is also required to lodge with the Registrar in the prescribed form any changes in the particulars of the beneficial owner of a company and where the beneficial owner ceases to be a beneficial owner of a company.

The Regulations also impose a duty on a company to investigate and obtain beneficial owner particulars where it has reasonable cause to believe that a person is a beneficial owner of a company by giving the owner notice to provide the same. The person is then required to respond to the notice within 21 days. Where the person fails to respond to the notice, the company is required to keep a copy of the warning notice in its register of beneficial owners, to restrict the relevant interest of a person where the failure to respond is within 14 days from the date of the warning notice, to note the restriction in the register and to file the same with the Registrar.

The effect of a restriction with respect to a relevant interest is that any transfer of the interest is void, no rights are exercisable in respect of the interest, no shares may be issued in right of the interest or in pursuance of an offer made to the interest holder and no payment may be made of sums due from the company in respect of the interest.

A company is also prohibited from disclosing beneficial ownership information except where it is for communication purposes, for compliance with the Regulations, in compliance with a court order or if it has a written consent of the beneficial owner. The Registrar may also use the information for communication purposes with the beneficial owner. However, the beneficial ownership information is prohibited from being made available to the public.

The impact of these Regulations is that companies with shareholders who have nominee shareholding will need to disclose details of the ultimate shareholders and investigate nominee structures that not only depict ownership arrangements but also control arrangements.


This alert is for informational purposes only. If you have any queries or need clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact Jacob Ochieng (Partner), Milly Mbedi (Senior Associate) or your usual contact at our firm for advice.

What the Data Protection Act, 2019 Means for You

Posted on November 13th, 2019

8th November, 2019 marked a great milestone in the history of Kenyan legislation with the enactment of the long-awaited Data Protection Act, 2019 (the Act). The purpose of the Act is to inter alia regulate the collection and processing of data in Kenya. The Act has introduced elaborate obligations to persons who collect and process data whose infringement would lead to stiff penalties of an administrative fine of up to KES 5 million or in case of an undertaking, up to 1% of its annual turnover of the preceding year, whichever is lower.

The Act establishes the office of the Data Protection Commissioner which is to be headed by a Data Commissioner. The role of the office of the Data Protection Commissioner includes overseeing the implementation of the Act, establishing and maintaining a register of data controllers and data processors, exercising oversight on data processing operations, receiving and investigating any complaint by any person on infringement of the rights under the Act.

The Act has extraterritorial application as it applies to data controllers and processors established or resident in or outside Kenya in so far as they process personal data while in Kenya or of data subjects located in Kenya.

All data controllers and data processors who meet the thresholds to be prescribed will now be required to be registered with the Data Commissioner. Failure to register is an offence, whose fine on conviction is KES 3 million or an imprisonment term not exceeding ten (10) years or both.

The Data Commissioner may carry out periodical audits of the processes and systems of the data controllers or data processors to ensure compliance with the Act.

Section 24 of the Act allows data controllers and data processors to appoint a data protection officer who may be a staff member whose role includes advising on compliance with the Act. A group of entities is allowed to appoint a single data protection officer provided that the officer is accessible by each entity.

The Act outlines the principles of data protection which are modelled on the principles set out in the EU General Data Protection Regulation. It further stipulates the rights of persons whose data is collected, including the right to: be informed of the use to which their personal data is to be put; access their personal data in custody of a data controller or data processor; to correction of false or misleading data; and to deletion of false or misleading data about them.

Processing of data is prohibited unless certain conditions set out under the Act, including the obtainment of the consent of the person whose data is processed are fulfilled. In addition, the processing of sensitive personal data is prohibited except for the stipulated permitted grounds. Further, personal data relating to the health of a person may only be processed by or under the responsibility of a health care provider; or by a person subject to the obligation of professional secrecy under any law.

The Act also stipulates that a person shall not use, for commercial purposes, personal data unless inter-alia the person obtains consent from the person whose data is to be used.

The Act outlines the conditions for the transfer of personal data outside of Kenya and the safeguards that must be considered. For instance, where the transfer is necessary for the performance of a contract between a person whose data is collected and the data controller or data processor or implementation of pre-contractual measures taken at the person’s request.

The impact of this Act is that persons who collect, control, manage and store data will need to review their terms and conditions and operations to avoid the risks of non-compliance.


This alert is for informational purposes only. If you have any queries or need clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact Jacob Ochieng, Partner, Milly Mbedi, Senior Associate or your usual contact at our firm, for advice relating to the Data Protection Act, 2019 and how the same will affect you

Amendments to the Companies Act No. 17 of 2015: Registration of Beneficial Owners and Takeover Transactions in Kenya

Posted on September 13th, 2019

On 5th July 2019 the President of the Republic of Kenya assented to the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 12 of 2019 (the “Miscellaneous Amendments Act”) whose date of commencement was 23rd July 2019. Among the major amendments contained in the Miscellaneous Amendments Act are amendments to Sections 93 and 611 of the Companies Act, 2015 (No.17 of 2015) (the “Companies Act”).

Section 93(1) of the Companies Act has been amended by deletion of the expression “which shall include information relating to beneficial owners of the company, if any”. In addition the expression “including information relating to beneficial owners, if any” contained in section 93(8) of the Companies Act has been deleted. Section 93 A has been inserted immediately after section 93.

Section 93A makes it mandatory for companies to keep a register of beneficial owners with the relevant information relating to the said beneficial owners as will be prescribed by the Companies (Beneficial Ownership Information) Regulations, 2019 (the “Regulations”) that are yet to be gazetted. Further, companies are now required to lodge a copy of the register with the Registrar within 30 days after the preparation of the same. Any amendments to the register shall be lodged with the Registrar within fourteen (14) days save for public listed companies. If a company fails to comply with this requirement, the company, and each officer of the company who is in default, commit an offence and on conviction each liable to a fine not exceeding Kenya Shillings five hundred thousand (KES 500,000/-). If following conviction the company continues to fail to comply, the company and each of its officers in default commits a further offence on each day of which the failure continues and on conviction are liable to a fine not exceeding Kenya Shillings fifty thousand (KES 50,000/-) for each such offence. The rationale of this amendment is to strengthen the government’s resolve in combating money laundering by requiring companies to reveal personal details of individuals holding at least ten percent (10%) stake or voting rights in the company. On the other hand, this amendment has the potential of undermining confidentiality in the business sphere and discouraging foreign investors who value their privacy from investing in local companies.

The amendments to Sections 611(2), 611(4), 615 (3), (4) and (5) of the Companies Act have fundamentally changed the statutory threshold for takeover bids under the Companies Act.  the amendments have deleted the ninety percent (90%) threshold and replaced it with fifty percent (50%) threshold. Hence, in case of a takeover offer, the statutory right will now accrue in cases where (a) the offeror has already acquired (or has unconditionally contracted to acquire) not less than fifty percent (50%) in the value of share to which the offer relates; and (b) if the shares to which the offer relates are voting shares, the offeror has acquired (or has unconditionally contracted to acquire) not less than fifty percent (50%) of the voting rights conferred by those shares. Once the offeror gives a notice pursuant to section 611, the offeror is bound to acquire the shares to which the notice relates on the terms specified in the offer. These amendments will significantly diluted the rights of minority shareholders. On the contrary, it provides ease of doing business in Kenya as it allows any shareholder holding at least fifty percent (50%) to buy out the other shareholders.


This alert is for informational purposes only. If you have any queries or need clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact Jacob Ochieng (Partner), Sheila Nyakundi (Associate) or your usual contact at our firm, for advice relating to the amendments and how the same will affect you.

Housing Fund Levy Set to Take Effect Next Month

Posted on April 16th, 2019

The Principal Secretary in the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development has today announced the coming to effect of the Housing Fund Levy (the levy) introduced, under the Finance Act, 2018.

The employer and the employee shall each be required to contribute 1.5% of the employee's monthly basic salary to a maximum of Kenya Shillings Five Thousand (KES 5000). Voluntary contributions will also be accepted to the scheme at a minimum of Kenya Shillings Two Hundred (KES 200) per month.

According to the notice, the levy shall fall within other payroll statutory deductions such as PAYE, NSSF and NHIF that are deducted by an employer every month. The first contribution shall be due by May 9th 2019.

The purpose of the levy is to finance the Affordable Housing Scheme under the Big 4 Agenda which will enable employees to purchase a home under the scheme, transfer the contributions to a pension scheme, transfer the contributions to another person under the scheme or, as cash to self, spouse, or a dependent child.

We shall update you as this matter unfolds.


Should you require further information on this subject please contact Geoffrey Muchiri (Partner) or Georgina Ogalo-Omondi(Partner): 

Kenya-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Treaty

Posted on March 19th, 2019

By Walter Amoko | Lena Onchwari

Introduction

Kenya, as is the case with other countries, has entered into a number of Double Tax Avoidance Treaties (DTAs) with an aim of avoiding or mitigating double taxation of persons (both legal and natural) residing in the contracting states but more importantly as a way of encouraging Foreign Direct Investments.

Kenya signed a DTA with Mauritius (a country that has a vast treaty network and favorable tax framework) which was subsequently gazetted by the Cabinet Secretary of Finance via Legal Notice Number 59 of 2014 issued under the Income Tax Act. The Tax Justice Network Africa challenged both the constitutionality of the DTA and Legal Notice before the High Court on multiple grounds including opacity of the process, the need for public participation in the exercise, that it was not for the benefit of Kenya and lack of Parliamentary scrutiny.

The High Court has now given its Judgment. The constitutional challenge to the DTA failed. The High Court found that the DTA had some form of ratification as required since both states agreed to be bound by it and that the process of its formulation was open and transparent. Further the court found there was no basis for faulting want of public participation. However, the Legal Notice that was intended to domesticate it was void because it was not tabled before Parliament within the time required by the Statutory Instruments Act.

Impact

The High court’s decision did not invalidate the Double Tax Avoidance Treaty by declaring it unconstitutional nor did it affect the propriety of anything done under it prior to the invalidation of the Legal Notice. It merely declared the Legal Notice as void for lack of parliamentary scrutiny. The impact of this is that though the DTA is still valid, it does not have legal effect in Kenya.

It is open to the Cabinet Secretary to issue a new Legal Notice in respect of this (and any other similar Legal Notices on any DTAs entered after 2013) and ensure full compliance with the Statutory Instruments Act including presenting it ; with all the required information, on time to Parliament.


Should you require further information on the DTA, please contact Walter Amoko (Partner) or Lena Onchwari (Partner):

Competition Authority Ready to Snap the Whip on Abuse of Buyer Power

Posted on December 11th, 2018

The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) has in the recent past increased its efforts in ensuring the provisions of the Competition Act are adhered to. This is evidenced by a statement issued by the CAK on 28th November, 2018 informing the public of the establishment of a buyer power department (BPD) within its premises to exclusively handle concerns about businesses abusing their influence over suppliers.

The Competition Act No 12 of 2010 (the Competition Act) defines “buyer power” as the influence exerted by an undertaking or group of undertakings in the position of a purchaser of a product or service to obtain from a supplier more favourable terms, or to impose a long-term opportunity cost including harm or withheld benefit which, if carried out, would be significantly disproportionate to any resulting long-term cost to the undertaking or group of undertakings. Buyer power is not prohibited. It is the abuse of buyer power in a market in Kenya or a substantial part of Kenya that is specifically prohibited under the Competition Act. This is intended to protect parties with a weaker bargaining power like suppliers to supermarkets.

Examples of conduct that constitutes abuse of Buyer Power includes:

  1. Delayed payment by a buyer of goods or services without justifiable reasons in breach of contractual terms;
  2. unilateral termination (or threat of termination) of a commercial agreement without notice;
  3. a buyers refusal to receive or return goods without justifiable reasons and in breach of contractual terms; and
  4. a buyer demanding preferential terms that are unfavorable to suppliers or demanding suppliers limit products sold to competitors.

In determining buyer power, the BPD will look at:

  1. The nature and determination of contract terms;
  2. the payment requested for access infrastructure; and
  3. the price paid to suppliers.

Industry-specific investigations

The CAK has indicated that the BPD will begin to undertake investigations in the retail sector following complaints of abuse of buyer power within the retail value chain. The implication of this is that some businesses in the retail sector may begin to receive requests for information from the BPD or worse off the BPD may raid the premises in a bid to collect the information and/or documentaion. It is therefore imperative that these businesses handle these requests carefully and seek legal advice at the earliest opportunity.

Penalties

The penalty for abuse of buyer power is a 5-year prison sentence or a fine of Kenya Shillings ten million (Kshs. 10,000,000), or to both.

The CAK may also impose an administrative penalty of up to ten percent (10%) of the undertaking’s preceding year’s turnover, or issue cease and desist orders to remedy the infringement.


Should you require further information on the BPD, 2017 please contact: Chacha Odera or Milly Mbedi

Related Insights

Anti-Money Laundering: Enhanced Customer Due Diligence

Posted on October 23rd, 2018

Overview

The Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2009  (POCAMLA) provides for the offence of money laundering and introduces measures for combating the offence. One such measure is that financial institutions, estate agencies and designated non-financial businesses or professions such as casinos and dealers of metals and stones (collectively, the reporting agencies) are under duty to verify customer identity and to undertake customer due diligence on existing customers or clients. Parliament has now raised the bar of this duty.

Enhanced Customer Due Diligence 

Through the Finance Act, 2018, the reporting agencies shall  apply enhanced customer due diligence on business relationships and transactions with any person or company originating from countries identified by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) as high risk of money laundering.

Further, the reporting agencies shall apply appropriate counter measures, proportionate to the risk profile of the countries subject to FATF or as advised by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance. These countermeasures include:

  • limiting or terminating business relationships or financial transactions with persons or companies, legal arrangements, or financial institutions located in high risk countries;
  • prohibiting reliance on third parties located in the high risk countries to conduct customer due diligence;
  • applying enhanced due diligence measures on correspondent banking relationships with financial institutions located in the high risk countries;
  • when considering the establishment of subsidiaries, branches or representative offices of financial institutions from high risk countries, reporting institutions shall take into account whether the financial institution is domiciled in a high risk country; and
  • submit a report listing customers and legal arrangements, originating from high risk countries to the Financial Reporting Center on an annual basis.

Conclusion

POCAMLA demonstrates the government’s commitment to enforce measures in sealing the gaps in the legislation with the increase of innovative financial startups and money remittance systems. The increased compliance procedures, due diligence requirements and counter measures will ensure both compliance with the law and maintain growth of the Kenyan economy.


Should you require further information on the POCAMLA, 2017 please contactNoella Lubano or Geoffrey Muchiri

About Us

Oraro & Company Advocates is a full-service market-leading African law firm established in 1977 with a strong focus on dispute resolution and corporate & commercial law. With a dedicated team of 12 partners, 16 associates and 40 support staff, the firm has been consistently ranked by leading legal directories such as Chambers Global, IFLR 1000 and Legal 500 as a top-tier firm in Kenya.

Contact Us

Oraro & Company Advocates
ACK Garden Annex, 6th Floor, 1st Ngong Avenue
P.O. Box 51236 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
T: +254 709 250 000
E: legal@oraro.co.ke | W: www.oraro.co.ke

Oraro & Company Advocates © 2020